Trump headlines at pro-gun rally in Albany, NY (VIDEO)

Donald Trump

Donald Trump, left, with Buffalo businessman Carl Paladino (Photo credit: The Associated Press)

American business magnate and pistol permit holder Donald Trump was among the headliners at a gun-rights rally outside the New York state Capitol building in Albany on Tuesday.

“I’m a big Second Amendment person,” said Trump before a crowd of about 3,500. “I’m a big, strong believer in it … I wanted to be here to support you. I’ll be with you no matter where you are.”

Trump spoke for about six minutes and arrived via his personal helicopter. He was greeted with great fanfare, folks toting signs reading ‘Trump for Governor.’

“You have the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. You have that right and they want to take it away,” Trump continued. “And they are taking it away, slowly but surely, they are taking it away.”

The event was designed to protest the NY SAFE Act, the sweeping gun control law passed in the wake of the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, as well as the man behind the law, Gov. Andrew Cuomo.

Republican gubernatorial candidate Rob Astorino also attended the rally. He urged attendees to get back at Cuomo by supporting his bid for governor

“He took away your rights, you take away his job,” Astorino said.

“His average contribution is about $27,000,” Astorino, alluding to the sizable sum of Cuomo’s campaign coffers, which is upwards of $30 million. “We’ll take your $27. We’ll take your $270. We’ll take anything.”

Tom King, the President of the New York Rifle and Pistol Association, attended the event as well, but he did not address the crowd. Earlier reports suggested that King wasn’t going to attend the event because he was worried that the rhetoric would be too contentious and threatening.

However, King told News Channel 13 that due to the organization’s lawsuit against the SAFE Act, it would be best if he didn’t participate as a speaker.

“Our lawyers have advised us not to (participate in the rally),” he said. “Last February, things that I said at the rally … were used in Amicus briefs trying to disqualify us from the lawsuit.”

With respect to the idea that the rhetoric could get out of hand, King said that “Gun owners are good people, and we don’t need a few who are over-exuberant to ruin it for the rest of us.”

In response to his critics at the rally, Cuomo obliquely acknowledged their sentiment, largely chalking it up to the fact that gun-rights is a polarizing issue.

“It’s a topic that drives strong emotions, like many topics — a woman’s right to choose, strong emotions — so I understand it,” Cuomo said. “But it’s the nature of the discussion.”

As noted in previous Guns.com articles, the SAFE Act implemented a number of controversial measures that restrict the rights of law-abiding gun owners; among them, it strengthened the state’s ban on ‘assault weapons’ by broadening the definition (changing the criteria from two cosmetic features, e.g. barrel shroud and a pistol grip, down to just one, e.g. a barrel shroud) and required registration of all the newly defined ‘assault weapons.’

Gun owners must register their ‘assault weapons’ by April 15. If they fail to register them, they must destroy them, turn them over to state police or sell them out of state by the deadline or else run the risk of being in violation of the law.

Additionally, the NY SAFE Act placed a ban on magazines that hold more than 10 rounds and does not permit gun owners to load more than seven rounds in those 10-round magazines. There is no grandfather clause for magazines that hold more than 10 rounds, gun owners had to either sell them out of state, destroy them or turn them over to state police by Jan. 15, 2014.

However, with respect to the seven-round limit, a federal judge ruled back in January that that aspect of the SAFE Act was “‘tenuous, strained and unsupported,” and thus struck down that provision. Now New Yorkers can load 10 rounds in their 10 round magazines.

The U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals is currently reviewing the case against the SAFE Act. In the coming months it’s expected to render a decision on the constitutionality of the law.