The M240L: The Myth of the $86,000 Machine Gun

02/10/12 8:40 PM | by

On February first, the Department of Defense made an announcement that they had budgeted 77.4 million dollars for a fixed-price contract for new, lightweight M240L 7.62 NATO machine guns.  The sticky bit was that it was for 900 guns.

Or at least, that’s how the announcement read: “Colt Defense, L.L.C., West Hartford, Conn. and FN Manufacturing, Columbia, S.C. were awarded a $77,400,000 firm-fixed-price contract between two contractors.  The award will provide for the procurement of 900 240L medium machine guns.”

colt m240 rifle

Back-of-the-napkin math, that means that these are some seriously advanced machine guns, at $86,000 a pop.  Fortunately, as the Times pointed out, “It is a pretty bad contract announcement.”  We decided to contact Colt Defense ourselves.  From Gerald R. Dinkel, President & CEO of Colt Defense:

“Happy to clarify, at least somewhat:

colt defense ceo“The unit price is NOT $86,000.  What you have in the announcement is the ceiling value of each contract and the quantity of 900 is the minimum quantity the government must order.  The maximum quantity has not been released publicly.  So there is no way, from the information made available, you can determine unit price, for either Colt or FN.”

So there you have it.  $77.4M is what the Army gets to spend on new machine guns, and 900 is the minimum order Colt and FN would agree to produce.  As to what the cost per unit will be?

“I think you can use whatever historical price you have and be in the ballpark.”  That ballpark happens to be about $9,200 per M240L, which means that the Army is getting at least 900 M240s for $8-ish million dollars, and perhaps upwards of 7,500 more machine guns down the line.  The total number of M240s being purchased is up to the Army.

us soldier holding colt rifle

But for the sake of soldier’s backs, we hope it’s as many as possible.  When it comes to DoD spending, even $77.4M is a drop in the bucket, and the M240L is a serious improvement over the M240B, and it can weigh up to 5.4 pounds lighter than the machine guns in use.

“The average weight of a soldier’s pack is 91lbs.  Ninety-one pounds. The bare minimum equipment weighs 60lbs.  This needs to change.  The human body cannot tolerate that mass for long, it causes trauma.  The Army knows this and is working to develop a new loadout for soldiers that weighs less.

soldiers shooting colt rifle in rocky terrain

“The M240L is a significant part of that.  Unlike the similar M240B and M249, it uses differently forged parts and a generous amount of titanium.  Compared to the M240B’s 26lbs, the L’s meager 22.3 (21.8 for the short-barrel variant) is downright svelte.”

So no, the Army hasn’t gone bonkers and Colt isn’t fleecing the DoD for millions.  But soldiers are getting lighter, newer equipment, and that’s good news all-around.

Photos from Wikipedia, the Army Times, and Rose-Hulman

Latest Reviews

  • CP 700

    Remington Brings Back Bolt-Action Handgun with 700 CP

    Remington is in full production with a new bolt-action handgun, the Model 700 CP. Though this is Remington's second bolt-action...

    Read Now
  • .308 Win

    Top Four Premium Hunting Ammo Choices for the .308 Win

    We’ve selected four of our favorite .308 hunting options that work well in most firearm platforms, tackling everything from predators...

    Read Now
  • Hellcat

    First 100 Rounds: A Look at the Springfield Armory Hellcat

    Springfield Armory hooked me up with a Hellcat to take for a test drive. Though my full thoughts and opinions...

    Read Now
  • Sixty Years On, Mossberg 500 Series Shotguns Going Strong

    Sixty years on, Mossberg 500 series of shotguns are going strong. They're well built, reliable and an excellent bang for...

    Read Now