Army officer says this soldier is too pretty to be taken seriously


Col. Lynette Arnhart thinks Cpl. Kristine Tejada looks too attractive in this picture to be taken seriously.

One high ranking female Army officer took up arms when she discovered an attractive young soldier in the pages of Army magazine.

“In general, ugly women [in the military] are perceived as competent while pretty women are perceived as having used their looks to get ahead,” Col. Lynette Arnhart wrote in an email.

Arnhart has been focusing her attention on figuring out how women can be successfully utilized in combat positions and what steps must be taken to get there. But when she saw the Cpl. Kristine Tejada, of the 1st Cavalry division on page 29 of the November issue of Army magazine, posed with just a slight smile while on security detail in Iraq, she was quick to express her distaste, New York Daily News reports.


Col. Lynette Arnhart is working to figure out what hurdles female soldiers must overcome in order to be placed into combat positions. She feels using overly attractive women in advertisements is detrimental to the cause.

“[The picture] shows a pretty woman, wearing makeup while on deployed duty. Such photos undermine the rest of the message (and may even make people ask if breaking a nail is considered hazardous duty),” Arnhart wrote.

Arnhart felt Tejada was too attractive to be taken seriously and advised photos of “more average looking women” that are “willing to do the dirty work necessary in order to get the job done” would be more effective for her cause.

While Arnhart feels strongly that less attractive women are perceived as more competent, Rep. Jackie Speier (D-Calif) feels the focus on cosmetic appearance is “backwards.”

“Integrating women into combat roles shouldn’t be treated as a cosmetic decision or a public relations exercise,” Speier said Wednesday. “It’s time for the Army to join the 21st century and recognize the untapped assets they have in women eager to fight for their country.”

[ New York Daily News ]

Read More On:

Latest Reviews

  • Four Years Later: IWI Tavor SAR Revisited

    Though IWI's X95, released in 2016, usurps the SAR, my Tavor SAR is still part of the family. For those just now coming across this model, how has it stood up over the years? Let's find out.

    Read More
  • Scope Review: Leupold VX-Freedom FireDot Twilight Hunter

    The budget-friendly line of American-made Leupold VX-Freedom riflescopes found a welcome audience last year, but 2020 sees even more interesting additions to the family, with our hands-down favorite being the illuminated-reticle FireDot line.

    Read More
  • Ruger AR-556: An Outstanding Gateway AR

    It should come as no surprise the Ruger name is synonymous with value, and its’ AR-556 looks to fit this mold as an entry-level AR-15 with a reasonable MSRP. So how does the no-frills Ruger AR-556 perform when put to the test? Read on to find out.

    Read More
  • A Look at the Sig P238, A Year Later

    The Sig Sauer P238 was the first .380 ACP BUG to grace my gun safe, a welcomed addition to the 9mm polymers, .38 SPL revolvers, and .45 ACP 1911s. After more than a year's worth of use, where do I stand on the P238? Let's find out.

    Read More