Editorial: Tried by 12 or carried by 6? (VIDEO)

I’ve heard it repeated dozens of times and so have you: “It’s better to be tried by twelve than carried by six.”  What does this cliché really mean anyway?  And, is it true?

Personally, I don’t like cliches too much.  They’re boring, they usually aren’t accurate and, by definition, they show a  lack of creativity; but even more importantly, cliches lack depth.  There’s so much information left unspoken in a phrase like “It’s better to be tried by 12 than carried by six” and when it comes to taking a life, there is no room to leave anything unexamined.

If you’re unfamiliar, this phrase essentially means that killing someone is preferable to being killed.  The insinuation is that the person doing the killing would live and be tried by a jury—made up of 12 people—while the number six references the number of pallbearers who would carry the coffin at their funeral had they decided not to draw their weapon.

Now you’ll get no argument from me that living is preferable to dying, but, I do propose that there’s a lot of misery associated with picking the first option too–tragedy that’s perhaps lost in this simplistic motto.  In kind, I think that if you are going to quote this cliche as justification for anything, it’s important to actually ask yourself would you really want to live through the mental and emotional anguish, not the mention the cruel uncertainty, of having to be tried before a grand jury?

The truth is that most cases don’t go to trial.  Often a defendant will take a plea bargain because if the case has made it that far up the legal food chain, there’s a chance something was wrong about the shooting, which is enough for the state to pursue to the bitter end.  In fact, even if a deadly force situation is fully justified, you will be advised to seek legal counsel.  That costs money, not t0 mention other social damages.

In the realm of hypothetical situations, it’s one I want desperately to avoid (and I’m sure you do too).  Not only would you have to deal with the emotional survival wounds, including stress, nightmares, anxiety and increased vigilance, but now depression, loss of sleep, and shame and guilt might also accompany your legal fees.  There is enough emotional pain accompanying a lethal encounter, that the last thing that anybody is going to want to do is have to pay someone to live through it all again.

Only the shortsighted, or those who are entirely ignorant of my work, will take this as some suggestions that people should hesitate when their lives are on the line.  That is not the case at all–if it’s honorable and morally and legally justifiable to defend yourself and your family, I feel it’s your obligation to do so.  However doing so comes with a cost and that cost isn’t set in stone.  It’s situation dependent and, ask those who have been in these situations, before and you’ll begin to see that perhaps for some there are times that a coffin would seem better than survival.

There are 22 veterans taking their own lives each day in this country.  That tells you something about the stress that comes from trauma, and something I highlighted in my book Warrior SOS: Interviews, Insights and Inspiration.

In the documentary film, That Which I Love Destroys Me, former Delta Force operator, Tyler Grey says, “Take anyone in the world … no one can hold out forever.  Take enough things to happen to a person at one time—enough negative things—and anyone, and everyone, can be broken.” These words need to sink into the brains of everyone who carries because if you do go to the trigger too fast and shoot an innocent person, you too might end up considering the coffin a welcome relief.

I guess the bottom line is, be careful and be prepared.  Be careful of being too eager to pull the trigger.  False bravado is destructive.  Be prepared for all aspects of a potentially lethal encounter (the premise explored in Marine Corp General James Mattis’ famous rule “Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everybody you meet” which I wish I could take credit for).  This doesn’t mean that we can be prepared for things we’ve yet to actually experience, but we can learn about the aftershock of lethal encounters and we prepare emotionally, spiritually, legally and tactically for them.

The views and opinions expressed in this editorial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of Guns.com.

Read More On:

Latest Reviews

  • Four Years Later: IWI Tavor SAR Revisited

    Though IWI's X95, released in 2016, usurps the SAR, my Tavor SAR is still part of the family. For those just now coming across this model, how has it stood up over the years? Let's find out.

    Read More
  • Scope Review: Leupold VX-Freedom FireDot Twilight Hunter

    The budget-friendly line of American-made Leupold VX-Freedom riflescopes found a welcome audience last year, but 2020 sees even more interesting additions to the family, with our hands-down favorite being the illuminated-reticle FireDot line.

    Read More
  • Ruger AR-556: An Outstanding Gateway AR

    It should come as no surprise the Ruger name is synonymous with value, and its’ AR-556 looks to fit this mold as an entry-level AR-15 with a reasonable MSRP. So how does the no-frills Ruger AR-556 perform when put to the test? Read on to find out.

    Read More
  • A Look at the Sig P238, A Year Later

    The Sig Sauer P238 was the first .380 ACP BUG to grace my gun safe, a welcomed addition to the 9mm polymers, .38 SPL revolvers, and .45 ACP 1911s. After more than a year's worth of use, where do I stand on the P238? Let's find out.

    Read More

Loading