ATF accidentally omits 5.56 'green tip' ammo exemption in reference guide

The omitted language, located on page 191 of the reference guided.

The omitted language under the section about Armor Piercing Ammunition on page 191 of the guide.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives re-released 2014’s firearms regulations reference guide over the weekend, saying it corrected omissions and editing errors.

The most notable include adding exemptions for 5.56mm SS109 and M855 ammunition.

Prior guides list prohibited armor piercing ammunition and the exemptions, but 2014’s guide, released in January, excluded the exemptions.

SS109 bullets and M855 cartridges are on the gun lobby’s endanger species list, so to speak, since a de facto ban could be placed on them if the ATF does not change a certain regulatory policy.

In a 17-page document, the ATF proposed changing the framework for which it exempts armor piercing ammo for sporting purposes. The agency suggests that enacting the changes would give it more flexibility to exempt ammunition based on manufacturers’ intended use and consumers’ actual use. Without an exemption, the agency says the 5.56 ammunition — identified by its green tip — could be banned under federal law.

Green tip ammo has a projectile core that contains steel and there are handguns chambered for it, so it’s considered armor piercing ammunition. While standard issue for the U.S. military, consumers mainly use it for target shooting.

Regulation changes aside, public focus has been entirely on the possible ban. Gun lobbies and lawmakers have been been rallying the public to fight the ban whereas gun control groups have been supporting it.

In an apparent effort to calm the waters, the ATF tweeted, “Nothing to analyze here folks, just a publishing mistake. No AP ammo exemptions revoked” along with a link to the revised document.

Public commenting on the proposed changes ends March 16.

Besides omitting exempted armor piercing ammunition, the ATF identified and corrected five mistakes total.

First, the ATF involved a missing citation in a section about the transfer and possession of machine guns, the second concerned regulatory changes for radiological equipment, and the last two were grammatical mistakes.

The ATF says it continues to review the guide to ensure no other typographical or editing errors, and asks the public to contact them about other potential errors. For that, contact the ATF at ORA@atf.gov.

Latest Reviews

  • Four Years Later: IWI Tavor SAR Revisited

    Though IWI's X95, released in 2016, usurps the SAR, my Tavor SAR is still part of the family. For those just now coming across this model, how has it stood up over the years? Let's find out.

    Read More
  • Scope Review: Leupold VX-Freedom FireDot Twilight Hunter

    The budget-friendly line of American-made Leupold VX-Freedom riflescopes found a welcome audience last year, but 2020 sees even more interesting additions to the family, with our hands-down favorite being the illuminated-reticle FireDot line.

    Read More
  • Ruger AR-556: An Outstanding Gateway AR

    It should come as no surprise the Ruger name is synonymous with value, and its’ AR-556 looks to fit this mold as an entry-level AR-15 with a reasonable MSRP. So how does the no-frills Ruger AR-556 perform when put to the test? Read on to find out.

    Read More
  • A Look at the Sig P238, A Year Later

    The Sig Sauer P238 was the first .380 ACP BUG to grace my gun safe, a welcomed addition to the 9mm polymers, .38 SPL revolvers, and .45 ACP 1911s. After more than a year's worth of use, where do I stand on the P238? Let's find out.

    Read More

Loading