25 groups provided input on ATF changes for armor piercing ammo

Although the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives folded last week on its proposed changes to how it regulates ammo, questions remain as to why they were introduced in the first place.

The ATF said its received an increase in exemption requests for armor piercing ammo since 2011 — 30 requests in four years — and details in the proposal stem back to November 2012, when it met with representatives from the gun industry, law enforcement, and non-governmental organizations.

In the meetings, 25 groups provided input on how the ATF could exempt armor piercing ammunition for sporting purposes. Due in large part to an increase in requests for exemption, the ATF said it sought to ease restrictions for ammo legally defined as armor piercing but primarily used for recreational purposes.

Readers take immediate notice to the possible ban on 5.56 “green tip” ammo in the 17-page document. The ammunition, which comprises M855 cartridges and SS109 bullets, was originally exempted because it’s a rifle round, but due to the release of new firearm designs, like AR pistols, the ammo is now considered armor piercing even though there’s little evidence to suggest it’s used to attack cops.

The Law Enforcement Officer Protection Act defines armor piercing ammo as having a projectile that’s larger than .22 caliber, contains specific metals — like steel — and can be fired out of a handgun.

The agency said 25 groups, including law enforcement, ammo companies, and both gun control and pro-gun lobbies, participated in the meetings. That list includes:

  1. National Fraternal Order of Police
  2. International Association of Chiefs of Police
  3. Office of Science and Technology of the National Institute of Justice
  4. FBI Ballistic Research Facility
  5. Homeland Security Investigations Counter Proliferation Investigation Unit
  6. Brady Center to prevent Gun Violence
  7. Coalition to Stop Gun Violence
  8. Violence Policy Center
  9. Mayors Against Illegal Guns
  10. National Association of Chiefs of Police
  11. Cutting Edge Bullets
  12. Remington Arms
  13. FGI Ammunition
  14. Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers Institute
  15. Hornady Manufacturing
  16. Winchester Ammunition
  17. National Shooting Sports Foundation
  18. ATK Federal
  19. Oak Ridge National Lab
  20. Mark Barnes and Associates
  21. Associate Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms
  22. National Rifle Association
  23. FAIR Trade Group
  24. Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies
  25. Safari Club International

Details of the meetings are not publicly available, but Guns.com submitted a Freedom Of Information Act request for more information.

Latest Reviews

  • Four Years Later: IWI Tavor SAR Revisited

    Though IWI's X95, released in 2016, usurps the SAR, my Tavor SAR is still part of the family. For those just now coming across this model, how has it stood up over the years? Let's find out.

    Read More
  • Scope Review: Leupold VX-Freedom FireDot Twilight Hunter

    The budget-friendly line of American-made Leupold VX-Freedom riflescopes found a welcome audience last year, but 2020 sees even more interesting additions to the family, with our hands-down favorite being the illuminated-reticle FireDot line.

    Read More
  • Ruger AR-556: An Outstanding Gateway AR

    It should come as no surprise the Ruger name is synonymous with value, and its’ AR-556 looks to fit this mold as an entry-level AR-15 with a reasonable MSRP. So how does the no-frills Ruger AR-556 perform when put to the test? Read on to find out.

    Read More
  • A Look at the Sig P238, A Year Later

    The Sig Sauer P238 was the first .380 ACP BUG to grace my gun safe, a welcomed addition to the 9mm polymers, .38 SPL revolvers, and .45 ACP 1911s. After more than a year's worth of use, where do I stand on the P238? Let's find out.

    Read More

Loading