Florida Rep. Greg Steube, R-Sarasota, last week submitted a bill to lift the gun free zones on post-secondary campuses across the state. (Photo: Greg Jefferies/Bradenton.com)
A rebooted measure that could see lawful concealed carry on Floridaâs public colleges and universities was introduced last week.
An effort to allow licensed concealed carry permit holders to bring their firearms on public campuses is being spearheaded by Rep. Greg Steube, R-Sarasota.
âI feel very strongly about Americans and Floridiansâ Second Amendment rights, and that shouldnât stop at school,â Steube said. âWeâve seen time and time again, these shootings on campuses where people canât protect themselves.â
Steubeâs proposal, HB 4001, would lift the controversial gun free zone that was the subject of much public debate in recent years.
Last session a measure backed by Steube made progress in the House but was sidelined in the Senate without a final vote after a barrage of ads funded by out of state gun control groups amid allegations of improper lobbying by campus police chiefs.
Gun control advocates are already stumping against the bill. The Florida chapter of the League of Women Voters, who have been very active in both anti-gun and anti-hunting measures in recent years, contends such proposals are dangerous.
âCampus carry bills are very concerning because they really have nothing to do with the Second Amendment,â said Orlando resident Patti Brigham, chair of the organizationâs Gun Safety Committee that was launched last year. âThis is a public safety issue.â
The measures have early support by gun rights groups, who contend those lining up against the measure are using tired arguments.
âWhen those who oppose self-defense by women roll out their worn-out âparade of horriblesâ about law-abiding gun owners, it is because the facts are not on their side,â Marion Hammer, executive director of the Unified Sportsmen of Florida and past president of the National Rifle Association, told Guns.com. âWhen they canât back up their political views with facts and reality, they resort to emotional rhetoric and hyperbole and predictions of doom.â
Hammer goes on to argue the efforts by LWV are counter-productive to the groupâs charter.
âNot only are opponents of this bill engaging in a war against the Second Amendment and self-defense, they are engaging in a war against women who need to be able to defend themselves against rape and physical abuse. Donât you think itâs odd for the League of Women Voters to engage in this anti-women movement?â asked Hammer.
Both bills are awaiting committee assignment for the 2016 session.