California bill to allow sheriffs, chiefs to ignore recent gun rights win advances

Assemblyman Mark Stone, center, saw his proposal to allow sheriffs to shift concealed carry permits to city police chiefs pass the Senate this week. (Photo:

The Senate gave its stamp of approval Wednesday to an Assembly bill to allow police agencies to circumvent a recent win in the courts on how sheriffs consider carry permit applications.

The proposal, which passed the Assembly 51-26 in April and the Senate 23-16 this week, would allow county sheriffs to establish agreements with local police chiefs to process carry license applications.

The practice, which gun rights advocates paint as an unofficial ban on issuing permits by sheriffs, was found illegal by a state court last January in the case of Lu v. Baca.

Supporters of the measure, backed by gun control organizations and police lobby groups, paint it as one to add better local control over who gets permits.

“I agree with the California State Sheriffs’ Association in that the police chief, whose department may be more familiar with city residents than a county sheriff, can be better positioned to make a determination that a person should be granted a concealed carry weapons (CCW) permit,” said Assemblyman Mark Stone, D-Scotts Valley, in a statement to lawmakers.

Stone’s bill, AB 1134, allows a sheriff to make a deal with the chief of a local police department to process all of the area’s CCW applications. A similar agreement in Los Angeles County in 2012 was at the center of the lawsuit decided by a California Superior Court.

Gun rights advocates contend the measure is a way to legally circumvent the Lu victory and add an additional hoop for would-be concealed carriers to jump through, especially in cases where a city police chief is disinclined to grant a permit under the state’s controversial may-issue practices.

“If enacted into law, AB 1134 would only increase the red tape and costs associated with CCW issuance and not allow Californians in their jurisdictions the ability to apply for CCW permits to every agency they can legally apply to,” reads a statement from the California Rifle and Pistol Association emailed to

Brandon Combs, president of the Firearms Policy Coalition and executive director of the Calguns Foundation, told previously that 1134 is an escape hatch for sheriffs to avoid their statutory duty to accept and process carry license applications.

“If sheriffs don’t like the responsibility of processing carry license applications, they should just support a bill to consolidate the entire system at the state level like armed guard permits are,” Combs said.

AB 1134 is now back in the Assembly waiting on concurrence, which is seen as being likely. After that, it’s on to Gov. Jerry Brown’s desk.

Latest Reviews

  • Four Years Later: IWI Tavor SAR Revisited

    Though IWI's X95, released in 2016, usurps the SAR, my Tavor SAR is still part of the family. For those just now coming across this model, how has it stood up over the years? Let's find out.

    Read More
  • Scope Review: Leupold VX-Freedom FireDot Twilight Hunter

    The budget-friendly line of American-made Leupold VX-Freedom riflescopes found a welcome audience last year, but 2020 sees even more interesting additions to the family, with our hands-down favorite being the illuminated-reticle FireDot line.

    Read More
  • Ruger AR-556: An Outstanding Gateway AR

    It should come as no surprise the Ruger name is synonymous with value, and its’ AR-556 looks to fit this mold as an entry-level AR-15 with a reasonable MSRP. So how does the no-frills Ruger AR-556 perform when put to the test? Read on to find out.

    Read More
  • A Look at the Sig P238, A Year Later

    The Sig Sauer P238 was the first .380 ACP BUG to grace my gun safe, a welcomed addition to the 9mm polymers, .38 SPL revolvers, and .45 ACP 1911s. After more than a year's worth of use, where do I stand on the P238? Let's find out.

    Read More