Florida high court to hear open carry appeal

Florida high court to hear open carry appeal

The Norman case involves that of a man who violated Florida law when his legally concealed gun was exposed by accident. (Photo: Al Behrman/AP)

The Florida Supreme Court on Wednesday confirmed it would hear a case dealing with how the state regulates the open carry of firearms.

The case is an appeal of a 2012 second-degree misdemeanor conviction of Dale Norman, 24, who was found guilty by a lower court for the open carry of a weapon outside of his home after his handgun, which he had a concealed carry permit for, became visible.

In February, a three-judge panel of the Florida Fourth District Court of Appeals upheld the original conviction citing that state laws against open carry do not, “destroy the core right of self-defense enshrined in the Second Amendment.”

Now the seven justices of the Sunshine State’s highest court will now debate that decision as announced this week.

Florida is just one of five states in the country that ban open carry and are in a club that includes California, New York, South Carolina and Illinois. However, gun rights advocates and Republican lawmakers have been chipping away at the restriction in recent years.

The practice is legal in the narrow confines of carry while target shooting, hunting or fishing and pro-gun advocates have long exercised that right.

Further, state lawmakers have attempted both past and present to expand carry rights to encompass wider adoption of the practice. A pair of measures currently working their way through Tallahassee would allow permit holders, such as Norman, the legal protection to carry without being prosecuted for violating the open carry ban if firearms are accidentally and unintentionally exposed.

Florida Carry Executive Director Sean Caranna was candid on the Norman case, which the gun rights group has long backed.

“The lower appeals court’s ruling was fundamentally flawed and we are confident that the Florida Supreme Court Justices will come to a more intellectually honest decision that will uphold the right to bear arms,” Caranna told Guns.com Wednesday.

A date for oral arguments will be set within 60 days.

Latest Reviews

  • Four Years Later: IWI Tavor SAR Revisited

    Though IWI's X95, released in 2016, usurps the SAR, my Tavor SAR is still part of the family. For those just now coming across this model, how has it stood up over the years? Let's find out.

    Read More
  • Scope Review: Leupold VX-Freedom FireDot Twilight Hunter

    The budget-friendly line of American-made Leupold VX-Freedom riflescopes found a welcome audience last year, but 2020 sees even more interesting additions to the family, with our hands-down favorite being the illuminated-reticle FireDot line.

    Read More
  • Ruger AR-556: An Outstanding Gateway AR

    It should come as no surprise the Ruger name is synonymous with value, and its’ AR-556 looks to fit this mold as an entry-level AR-15 with a reasonable MSRP. So how does the no-frills Ruger AR-556 perform when put to the test? Read on to find out.

    Read More
  • A Look at the Sig P238, A Year Later

    The Sig Sauer P238 was the first .380 ACP BUG to grace my gun safe, a welcomed addition to the 9mm polymers, .38 SPL revolvers, and .45 ACP 1911s. After more than a year's worth of use, where do I stand on the P238? Let's find out.

    Read More

Loading