Lawmakers in New York, Illinois call for action on No Fly List gun sales

Lawmakers in New York, Illinois call for action on no fly list gun sales

U.S. Sen. Charles Schumer and New York Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo on Sunday called for gun sales in the state to be checked against the federal terror watch list. (Photo: governor.ny.gov)

After last week’s execute action by Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy to bar those on no-fly lists from buying guns, high-ranking Democrats in at least two states are following suit.

Democrats U.S. Sen. Charles Schumer and New York Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo said in a joint announcement Sunday that the easiest way to prevent sales to individuals on the no-fly list, which is maintained by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in the Empire State is to simply add it to the current background check system that’s also operated by the FBI.

“Railing to close the Terror Gap in New York State will send a message to other states – and Congress – to act,” said Schumer in a statement. “The federal government has always been there for New York when it comes to giving us the tools we need to fight terrorism and I remain hopeful that they’ll work with us on preventing terror suspects from passing gun background checks.”

Efforts by Dems on Capitol Hill to tie the terror lists to gun sales have only resulted in delaying tactics while lawmakers try to gain enough votes for a move to force a vote on the issue.

In Illinois, state Rep. Gregory Harris, from Chicago, on the same day as Malloy’s announcement in Connecticut, filed a measure in the state House that would require the Illinois State Police to compare the database of those with Firearm Owner’s Identification Card previously issued against the terror watch list. Those found on the list would have five days to surrender their card, needed to legally own guns in the Land of Lincoln. Harris’ bill gained 16 co-sponsors by Monday.

Meanwhile, in Massachusetts, Gov. Charlie Baker announced he would look into a similar proposal such as in neighboring Connecticut, as reported by the Boston Herald.

The executive action proposed in Connecticut would strike at future gun transfers as well as current firearms permit holders. Those denied would be allowed to appeal to the state Board of Firearms Permit Examiners and finally to Superior Court.

National and state gun rights groups warned of possible litigation against both Malloy and the federal government should the action move forward, citing the order would be a clear “due process” violation of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Latest Reviews

  • Tuck & Carry: CCW in a Skirt

    Aimed at those who want the comfort and convenience of a skirt but with the protection of a holstered gun, the Tuck & Carry occupies what I term apparel holsters -- that is clothing/holster duos.

    Read More
  • The Marlin Dark in .45-70 is Stealthy and Modern

    Flash forward the lever gun of Western lore to the 2020s, where Marlin has taken that classic design and given it a modern upgrade. Meet the Marlin Dark.

    Read More
  • Gear Review: Sig Sauer Tango 6T 1-6

    Sig Sauer has long been a big name in the firearms industry, so it came as no surprise several years ago when Sig filled out its repertoire with its own optics line. Today, we’re looking at the Tango 6T, a 1-6 low power variable optic.

    Read More
  • First Look: Hornady 6mm ARC

    Hornady brought another impressive project to the shooting public in 2020 with the introduction of the 6mm Advanced Rifle Cartridge.

    Read More

Loading