Why should the Feds, CDC research gun violence?

This summer, it seems that the Los Angeles Times started a shockwave of gun grabbing outrage when they published an article by Michael Hiltzik blaming the NRA for blocking gun violence research over the past couple decades. It’s not the first article that has touched on the subject this year, but it certainly has fueled the ire of many gun control advocates.

This horribly slanted article seems to suggest that a lack of recent gun violence research caused the horrible Orlando massacre. Hiltzik notes: “The Orlando massacre reminds us that there’s an enormous amount we don’t know about gun violence – what causes it, what its consequences are for surviving families, how to stop it. You can blame our ignorance on the National Rifle Assn. – and on the federal officials the NRA has intimidated away from this crucial field of public health for 20 years.”

The premise of this opening paragraph is severely flawed. If there is such a void on gun research as this article suggests, why is it that every other month, the New York Times reports on a new gun violence study? The truth is that many state agencies and non-profit organizations (on both sides of the aisle) have funded gun violence research of their own, so there is no need for the federal government to waste tax dollars on it. Either anti-gun activists are ignorant to all of this research or they disagree with the studies that have already been published and want to influence the development of brand-new, skewed research.

The article goes on to describe how, after the Newtown massacre in 2012, “President Obama issued an executive order instructing the CDC [Center for Disease Control and Prevention] to ‘conduct or sponsor research into the causes of gun violence and the ways to prevent it,’” but the CDC would not conduct the research until it received the funding to do so. Hiltzik goes so far as to accuse Congress of acting as the “NRA’s cat’s-paw” by “repeatedly rejecting bills to provide $10 million for the work.”

My heart goes out to the families whose lives have been torn by gun violence, but is it really necessary to spend federal government funds to research it? Sadly, we have plenty of recent case studies to figure out what causes gun violence and to understand the horrific consequences for the families of its victims.

One lesson we have learned is that there is no universal solution to the problem. As recent tragedies have demonstrated, gun violence can stem from as varied motives as jihadism, mental health issues and social pressures.

If the purpose of the research is to figure out the most effective form of gun control, then advocates will be disappointed even if the government decides to sponsor research. Gun control laws assume that everyone actually follows the law, which reality consistently proves is a false assumption. Bad people, like the Orlando gunman who had ties to radical Islam, don’t follow laws and couldn’t care less if the Second Amendment was repealed. They will find a gun through theft or the black market if they have to.

As a result, no amount of gun control will ever eliminate the gun violence that is perpetrated by these heartless criminals. All that we can do is make sure good people (the kind that follow the law) have access to firearms, know how to handle a them safely and have legal protection if they are forced to defend themselves or their families.

Another interesting dynamic of this debate is the fact that gun grabbers have called for the CDC to fund gun control studies. Why the CDC and not the Department of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms?

Politics, of course.

Rather than highlighting the issues of the individual gun owner, anti-gun politicians like to paint gun ownership as a public health crisis. In doing so, they can pretend to fight against gun violence through blanket gun control laws and vilify all gun owners in the process.

If politicians were courageous and/or patient enough to tackle the root cause of gun violence rather than rehash failed gun control policies, we might be able to put a stop to massacres like the one we saw in Orlando. Then again, it’s a lot easier just to blame the NRA.

The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the author’s and do not necessarily reflect the position of Guns.com.

Latest Reviews

  • Tuck & Carry: CCW in a Skirt

    Aimed at those who want the comfort and convenience of a skirt but with the protection of a holstered gun, the Tuck & Carry occupies what I term apparel holsters -- that is clothing/holster duos.

    Read More
  • The Marlin Dark in .45-70 is Stealthy and Modern

    Flash forward the lever gun of Western lore to the 2020s, where Marlin has taken that classic design and given it a modern upgrade. Meet the Marlin Dark.

    Read More
  • Gear Review: Sig Sauer Tango 6T 1-6

    Sig Sauer has long been a big name in the firearms industry, so it came as no surprise several years ago when Sig filled out its repertoire with its own optics line. Today, we’re looking at the Tango 6T, a 1-6 low power variable optic.

    Read More
  • First Look: Hornady 6mm ARC

    Hornady brought another impressive project to the shooting public in 2020 with the introduction of the 6mm Advanced Rifle Cartridge.

    Read More