California ballot initiative goes further on bullet background checks

10/27/16 8:22 AM | by

californiabullets

Voters will decide whether to approve Proposition 63 on Nov. 8. (Photo: California Counts)

A ballot initiative in California looks to go a step further on a bullet background check law already passed by the state’s legislature in May.

Some of the major bullet points of Proposition 63 have already been voted on by California lawmakers and signed by the governor. The law is set to take effect in January 2019. But Prop. 63 adds more red tape to one of the processes getting the most attention — the bullet background check.

California Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom developed the ballot initiative. He’s running for governor of California in 2018.

“I’m fighting to pass Prop. 63 because it will, without question, reduce gun violence and save lives,” he said.

But the law and Newsom’s Prop. 63 would see bullet background checks carried out in vastly different ways.

The legislation would make Californians provide an ID card and have an immediate background check when trying to buy ammunition. The check would happen in a database of people who can’t own guns.

Prop. 63 would make Californians get a four-year permit from the state’s Department of Justice. The DOJ would run a background check and have 30 days to approve the permit. Those applying would have to pay $50 and provide identifying information including a fingerprint. That information would go into a new database. Then people would have to show the permit each time they went to buy ammunition. If voters pass the initiative, it would take effect on Jan. 1, 2018.

The NRA urges Californians to vote against the proposal.

“Prop 63 is a very bad proposal that Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom wants you to believe will keep guns and ammunition out of the wrong hands,” writes Kimberly Rhode for the NRA. Rhode is a trap and skeet shooter, and a six-time Olympic medal winner. “Only bureaucrats would believe that criminals and terrorists would jump through these hoops to buy ammunition,” she said.

Other provisions in Proposition 63 include the prohibition of large-capacity ammunition magazines, a measure already passed by the legislature, a requirement that California authorities share data with the FBI so California felons can’t buy guns in other states, a requirement that lost or stolen firearms be reported within five days, and several other restrictions.

Newsom says the proposal merits approval.

“Anyone who sincerely thinks gun violence is a problem won’t hesitate to support Prop. 63,” he said.

Latest Reviews

  • Aguila 5mm Ammo Breathes New Life into Forgotten Plinkers (VIDEO)

    Thanks to Aguila and a revitalized interest in longer-range rimfire shooting, 40-year-old Remington 591 and 592 rifles are gaining popularity.

    Read Now
  • gun safe, safetech

    SnapSafe Treklite Serves Safe Gun Storage on the Go

    Billed as a means to easily carry a gun on the go, the SnapSafe TrekLite appears, on the surface, to...

    Read Now
  • dd5v1

    Gun Review: Daniel Defense DD5V1 rifle in .308 (VIDEO)

    Unlike Daniel Defense’s standard-fare – AR-15s chambered in 5.56 – the DD5V1 is an AR-10 chambered in .308. Guns.com checks...

    Read Now
  • Rex vs Canik

    Gun Review: Rex Zero 1 vs Canik TP9 Elite Combat (VIDEO)

    Two pistols that come with everything but the kitchen sink are FIME Group's Rex Zero 1 Tactical and Canik TP9...

    Read Now