Polls show support for California ammo regulation ballot measure declining

California Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom has seen his voter referendum lose support in recent weeks. (Photo: Paul Chinn/The San Francisco Chronicle)

California Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom has seen his voter referendum lose support in recent weeks. (Photo: Paul Chinn/The San Francisco Chronicle)

The latest USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times poll suggests voters in California may be cooling to Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom’s Prop. 63 “Safety for All” voter initiative, which would place new and historic restrictions on ammunition sales.

Newsom, who is currently running to replace Gov. Jerry Brown in office, will place an expansive five-point list of gun control measures in front of voters in the coming general election.

The now $5.2 million referendum will end grandfathering of magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds, require relinquishment of weapons by those prohibited by the state from legal possession and mandatory reporting of lost or stolen guns. In addition, it would require background checks prior to all ammunition sales – a first for any state.

According to the latest poll, the measure still has significant support with 58 percent of likely voters approving it and only 35 percent opposed.

However, this is down from 64 percent of respondents supporting Prop. 63 in the same poll’s September survey. Further, in the current data, the poll found that support for the measure among likely voters drops to 52 percent when they hear the arguments put forward by the two sides. This figure, when the margin of error is applied, dips below half of respondents.

Pollsters found over 77 percent of those surveyed who identified as Democrats supported the measure, whereas few Republicans — 30 percent — liked the concept.

Gun rights advocates campaigning hard against the ballot initiative welcomed the news of the apparent decline in support from last month’s numbers.

“I guess that old saying, ‘The truth hurts’ applies when it comes to Prop. 63,” Stop Prop 63 Committee Spokesman Craig DeLuz said in a statement emailed to Guns.com. “Prop. 63 is another attempt by Newsom and his one percent, elitist friends to attack law-abiding Californians.”

Of the two groups opposing Prop. 63, total funding reported to California Secretary of State Alex Padilla as of Nov. 3 amounts to just $868,351.

The poll among 1,500 registered California voters was in the last week of October and has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.3 percentage points.

Latest Reviews

  • Springfield SAINT: Your High-Value AR-15

    The Springfield Armory SAINT offers a high-value, no-frills-required AR-15 platform. We put it through its paces to see if it's worth adding to your collection. After several trips to the range, we can confirm this is a great gun.

    Read More
  • The Sig Sauer P320 X5 Legion is an Amazing Pistol

    The Sig Sauer p320 X5 Legion has been on the market for a little while now. So I wanted to bring you a review after shooting more than 30,000 rounds through mine over a year of competing in 3-gun and USPSA.

    Read More
  • 17 Reasons to Love the Glock 17

    Glock 17s are trusted by law enforcement and militaries around the world. But they are also great guns for civilians. Here are our top 17 reasons to get a Glock 17.

    Read More
  • Sig P320 vs. Sig P365 for Concealed Carry

    Sig’s P365 and P320 offer two great options for concealed carry. Their compact sizes and high magazine capacities make them excellent choices for everyday carry. They're also easy to customize.

    Read More