Nevada background check expansion still in holding pattern

Nevada Attorney General Adam Laxalt last week found Question 1, the voter-approved background check expansion measure, to be unenforceable as written (Photo:  Las Vegas Review-Journal)

Nevada Attorney General Adam Laxalt contends Question 1, the voter-approved background check expansion measure, to be unenforceable as written (Photo: Las Vegas Review-Journal)

While the controversial Question 1 ballot initiative was narrowly approved by Nevada voters, its effective date is still up in the air.

Set to take effect last month, Nevada Attorney General and Republican Adam Laxalt in December issued an opinion that the new expanded background check law does not meet legal muster and won’t be enforced, leaving some in the Silver State confused.

“We get a lot of calls on it, like ok, ‘what’s the deal? Do you have to do it? Do you have to go into a gun store now?'” Michael Goyak, the manager at Venture Munitions, told local media. “It is the law, but it’s not a law that you have to follow.”

Laxalt said a Dec. 14 letter from the Federal Bureau of Investigation states private party background checks are in the purview of Nevada’s own resources as one of the 13 “point of contact” states that conduct their own checks through a central repository. With the federal government declining to process the expanded checks directly, and the Nevada Department of Public Safety neither authorized nor funded by the ballot measure’s language to run the checks, Laxalt says the law is unenforceable.

While the social media accounts for Nevadans for Background Checks, the largely Everytown-financed effort behind Q1, have been silent since last November the group may be looking at litigation. A Las Vegas-based law firm this month filed what is reportedly a massive public records request for Q1-related communications between Laxalt and other state agencies, the FBI and the National Rifle Association.

“We think it’s important to understand some of the conversations that have or have not been happening in regards to implementation of that law,” said Jennifer Crowe, Nevadans for Background Checks.

Question 1 failed in 16 of the state’s 17 counties with only voters in Clark County approving the measure, in the end passing by around 10,000 votes.

Latest Reviews

  • A Look at the Sig P238, A Year Later

    The Sig Sauer P238 was the first .380 ACP BUG to grace my gun safe, a welcomed addition to the 9mm polymers, .38 SPL revolvers, and .45 ACP 1911s. After more than a year's worth of use, where do I stand on the P238? Let's find out.

    Read More
  • Tuck & Carry: CCW in a Skirt

    Aimed at those who want the comfort and convenience of a skirt but with the protection of a holstered gun, the Tuck & Carry occupies what I term apparel holsters -- that is clothing/holster duos.

    Read More
  • The Marlin Dark in .45-70 is Stealthy and Modern

    Flash forward the lever gun of Western lore to the 2020s, where Marlin has taken that classic design and given it a modern upgrade. Meet the Marlin Dark.

    Read More
  • Gear Review: Sig Sauer Tango 6T 1-6

    Sig Sauer has long been a big name in the firearms industry, so it came as no surprise several years ago when Sig filled out its repertoire with its own optics line. Today, we’re looking at the Tango 6T, a 1-6 low power variable optic.

    Read More