Washington Senate passes tweak to expanded background check law

A 2014 ballot initiative which expanded background checks in Washington is getting a slight remodeling by state lawmakers this session. (Photo: Alliance for Gun Responsibility)

A 2014 ballot initiative which expanded background checks in Washington is getting a slight remodeling by state lawmakers this session. (Photo: Alliance for Gun Responsibility)

A Senate bill making several changes to Washington’s voter-approved I-594 ballot referendum on universal background checks is headed to the House.

The measure, a substituted version of SB 5552, aims to make a series of modifications to the state’s two-year-old background check mandate. It passed the Senate on Feb. 23 by unanimous vote.

The bill would expand temporary transfers under the law and add in-laws to the list of immediate family members exempted from person to person gun loans. Further, the measure adds exceptions for some curio and relic swaps between collectors and transfers for work such as between security guards and their employers. In cases of potential suicide prevention, a hot-button issue in Washington, the proposal adds an exception for temporary transfers to prevent self-inflicted bodily harm.

Finally, SB 5552 clarifies that flare guns and construction tools are not covered by the background check requirement, a lingering concern.

The controversial and at times confusing I-594 universal background check ballot initiative was passed by voters in 2014, with broad support from urban Seattle-Tacoma areas. Fronted by the Alliance for Gun Responsibility and backed by $10 million from national gun control groups and billionaire philanthropists, the measure navigated its way to victory at the polls and shrugged off legal challenges from gun rights advocates.

Last October, the law saw its first prosecution after a man was charged with unlawful transfer of a pistol that was used in the murder of a 17-year-old two days later. The individual who was sold the firearm was 19 at the time of the transfer and unable to buy a handgun under federal law due to his age. Supporters of the law argue I-594 has resulted in at least 144 private sales being declined by the FBI since taking effect.

Second Amendment groups welcomed passage of SB 5552. “While this bill is not a complete fix of everything we’ve outlined as problematic with the I-594 firearms transfer law, it is an important start for bipartisan cooperation on Second Amendment civil rights issues,” said Firearms Policy Coalition Legislative Advocate Philip Watson in a statement.

The measure has been referred to the House Judiciary Committee. Also, before the committee is proposed legislation, HB 1380, by Rep. Matt Shea, R-Spokane Valley, that would repeal the I-594 background check expansion altogether.

Latest Reviews

  • Tuck & Carry: CCW in a Skirt

    Aimed at those who want the comfort and convenience of a skirt but with the protection of a holstered gun, the Tuck & Carry occupies what I term apparel holsters -- that is clothing/holster duos.

    Read More
  • The Marlin Dark in .45-70 is Stealthy and Modern

    Flash forward the lever gun of Western lore to the 2020s, where Marlin has taken that classic design and given it a modern upgrade. Meet the Marlin Dark.

    Read More
  • Gear Review: Sig Sauer Tango 6T 1-6

    Sig Sauer has long been a big name in the firearms industry, so it came as no surprise several years ago when Sig filled out its repertoire with its own optics line. Today, we’re looking at the Tango 6T, a 1-6 low power variable optic.

    Read More
  • First Look: Hornady 6mm ARC

    Hornady brought another impressive project to the shooting public in 2020 with the introduction of the 6mm Advanced Rifle Cartridge.

    Read More