Baltimore council waters down proposed mandatory minimums for illegal guns

07/26/17 3:30 PM | by

Baltimore council waters down proposed mandatory minimums for illegal guns

Two were arrested after a scuffle following lengthy hearings this week on a controversial proposal to establish a mandatory minimum sentence for those found with handguns near Baltimore schools, parks, and other public buildings. (Photo: WBFF)

Two were arrested after a scuffle following lengthy hearings this week on a controversial proposal to establish a mandatory minimum sentence for those found with handguns near Baltimore schools, parks, and other public buildings. (Photo: WBFF)

After a public hearing degenerated into arrests in Baltimore on Tuesday, an amended draft ordinance designed to bring strict sentencing for some found with guns passed out of committee.

The proposal, which originated with Mayor Catherine Pugh’s office, was passed 5-2 by the Judiciary Committee after hours of sometimes emotional hearings were briefly interrupted by the arrest of two people following a melee, as reported by local media.

The measure originally aimed to criminalize the carry or transport of a handgun, either openly or concealed, within 100 yards of a public building, park, church, school, or “other place of public assembly” with a mandatory penalty of one-year imprisonment and a $1,000 fine.

As modified this week, first-time offenders would not be eligible for the mandatory sentence except in cases where the illegal handgun they possessed was used in a crime. Also, the state’s attorney’s office could use discretion in charging individuals with violations of the city ordinance should it become law, skirting the issue entirely.

However, even diluted from the original language proposed by Pugh, the bill is facing serious opposition from some on the Council. Prior to this week’s hearings, slightly less than half of the 14-member body was in favor of the measure and a few outliers remain unconvinced.

Brandon Scott, who represents the Second District, told WJZ he was staunchly opposed to the proposal.

“The amendments make the bill easier to stomach, it still doesn’t change the fact that I disagree with the bill in its entirety and its principles of mandatory minimums,” Scott said.

In addition, the ordinance has drawn fire from civil rights advocates, with attorney Joshua Prince penning a letter to city leaders warning of a number of potential legal pitfalls resulting from the patchwork of new gun free zones and arbitrary language.

The amended measure is expected to be taken up by the full council on Aug. 14.

Latest Reviews

  • The Midwest Industries Combat Rail Series is a multi-tool pistol (VIDEO)

    With the .300 AAC Blackout growing in popularity, gun makers have stepped up to fill demand. Standing at the forefront...

    Read Now
  • The Sightmark M-Spec Ultra Shot is high-dollar work at low-dollar prices

    If you’re looking for an optic that puts in high-dollar work at low-dollar prices, give some serious consideration to the...

    Read Now
  • Gear Review: Range days made easy with Uplula mag loader

    Not a single shooter I know enjoys loading rounds into often stiff and difficult mags; however, there is one company...

    Read Now
  • The All-American 500: Big Horn Armory’s AR500 in .500 Auto Max (VIDEO)

    “From prairie dogs to pachyderms to Peterbilts -- ” that’s one helluva promise to hunters on the capability of the...

    Read Now