Class action lawsuit filed against Maryland's ban on bump stocks, binary triggers

Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan, seen here last week at a press conference, signed a broad ban on bump stocks and similar devices into law earlier this year. (Photo: Joe Andrucyk/Office of the Governor)

Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan, seen here at an April press conference, signed a broad ban on bump stocks and similar devices into law earlier this year. (Photo: Joe Andrucyk/Office of the Governor)

Four gun owners who possess devices termed “rapid fire trigger activators” under a looming new law in Maryland are taking the state to federal court.

The class-action lawsuit, filed Monday against Gov. Larry Hogan in his official capacity, argues that the ban he signed into law in April is illegal when compared against both the U.S. and state constitutions. Maryland’s law regulating rapid fire trigger activators– defined as bump stocks, binary trigger systems, burst triggers and trigger cranks– is set to go into effect in October. The plaintiffs in the suit–Paul Mark Brockman, Robert and Caroline Brunger, and David Orlin– all own one or more devices subject to the pending ban.

The challenge is backed by Maryland Shall Issue and takes the state to task on several legal points.

First, they argue that a mandatory surrender of their devices without any compensation violates the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment as well as protections offered by the Maryland Constitution. Next, the lawsuit attacks that the only promise of legal ownership, that of federal approval under currently unwritten regulations on bump stocks and similar devices– one that the ATF has already rebuffed Maryland gun owners on– is a violation of due process protections.

Finally, the complaint makes the argument that the new law is badly written and so vague that it can’t provide reasonable protection to those who are unsure if their devices meet the definition of a rapid-fire trigger activator while simultaneously failing to give police, prosecutors and the courts enough guidance to enforce the law without being discriminatory.

A ban on bump stocks in Florida is the subject of a federal lawsuit on similar grounds.

Violators of Maryland’s ban would be subject to felony charges, facing three years in prison and a $5,000 fine.

The law passed 128-7 in the state House and 35-11 in the Senate and was opposed by the National Rifle Association at the time who characterized the move as “broad and overreaching.”

The plaintiffs are seeking for the court to declare a class consisting of all owners of banned devices in Maryland prior to the law going into effect and a trial to determine relief and damages to include compensation for their devices at fair market value plus interest, costs and attorneys’ fees.

Latest Reviews

  • Four Years Later: IWI Tavor SAR Revisited

    Though IWI's X95, released in 2016, usurps the SAR, my Tavor SAR is still part of the family. For those just now coming across this model, how has it stood up over the years? Let's find out.

    Read More
  • Scope Review: Leupold VX-Freedom FireDot Twilight Hunter

    The budget-friendly line of American-made Leupold VX-Freedom riflescopes found a welcome audience last year, but 2020 sees even more interesting additions to the family, with our hands-down favorite being the illuminated-reticle FireDot line.

    Read More
  • Ruger AR-556: An Outstanding Gateway AR

    It should come as no surprise the Ruger name is synonymous with value, and its’ AR-556 looks to fit this mold as an entry-level AR-15 with a reasonable MSRP. So how does the no-frills Ruger AR-556 perform when put to the test? Read on to find out.

    Read More
  • A Look at the Sig P238, A Year Later

    The Sig Sauer P238 was the first .380 ACP BUG to grace my gun safe, a welcomed addition to the 9mm polymers, .38 SPL revolvers, and .45 ACP 1911s. After more than a year's worth of use, where do I stand on the P238? Let's find out.

    Read More

Loading