Activist church pushes Smith & Wesson to fund gun violence research

The Smith & Wesson booth during SHOT Show 2018 in Las Vegas. (Photo: Daniel Terrill/Guns.com)

A group of nuns who successfully encouraged investors to force Sturm, Ruger & Company to research gun violence earlier this year turned their sights on another major publicly traded gun maker: Smith & Wesson.

The Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary filed a resolution asking American Outdoor Brands Corporation — the parent company for the Massachusetts-based Smith & Wesson — to report on the risks involved in selling firearms.

“Contrary to what the company suggests, AOBC has both the responsibility and capacity to play a more active role in how its products are used; the requested assessment and reporting are the first steps towards acceptance of this responsibility,” the group said in the resolution.

The group, joined by 10 other religious affiliated organizations, argued AOBC should research gun violence and its financial impact on the company’s bottom line. They pointed to recent events like a corporate backlash on the gun industry following February’s mass shooting at a high school in Parkland, Florida. The gunman in that scenario used an Smith & Wesson-made AR-15 to murder 17 people and injure 17 others.

If approved by shareholders, the company would have to publish the report by Feb. 8, 2019. “The resolution does not request that AOBC produce smart guns or other specific products; nor does it call for the company to endorse a gun control regulatory or policy agenda,” the group said. “The resolution does, however, ask for reporting because existing disclosures of current risk mitigation measures are seen as insufficient for investors to assess their effectiveness.”

In response to the resolution, the AOBC board of directors said they recommend a vote “against” the proposal. “We do not believe that a report from us would in any way advance gun safety, mitigate criminal gun violence, or better educate our stockholders with respect thereto. In fact, the preparation of a report from us as requested by the Proponent would be redundant, and therefore an unnecessary undertaking and expense.”

In May, the group successfully influenced Ruger shareholders to pass a similar resolution despite protests by the Connecticut’s company’s board of directors. Leading up to the vote, the board urged shareholders to reject the resolution, arguing “intentional criminal misuse of firearms is beyond our control.” Nonetheless, investors passed the resolution anyway. That report is due in February.

Latest Reviews

  • Four Years Later: IWI Tavor SAR Revisited

    Though IWI's X95, released in 2016, usurps the SAR, my Tavor SAR is still part of the family. For those just now coming across this model, how has it stood up over the years? Let's find out.

    Read More
  • Scope Review: Leupold VX-Freedom FireDot Twilight Hunter

    The budget-friendly line of American-made Leupold VX-Freedom riflescopes found a welcome audience last year, but 2020 sees even more interesting additions to the family, with our hands-down favorite being the illuminated-reticle FireDot line.

    Read More
  • Ruger AR-556: An Outstanding Gateway AR

    It should come as no surprise the Ruger name is synonymous with value, and its’ AR-556 looks to fit this mold as an entry-level AR-15 with a reasonable MSRP. So how does the no-frills Ruger AR-556 perform when put to the test? Read on to find out.

    Read More
  • A Look at the Sig P238, A Year Later

    The Sig Sauer P238 was the first .380 ACP BUG to grace my gun safe, a welcomed addition to the 9mm polymers, .38 SPL revolvers, and .45 ACP 1911s. After more than a year's worth of use, where do I stand on the P238? Let's find out.

    Read More

Loading