Republican Senators Reintroduce Hearing Protection Act

03/15/19 5:30 AM | by

A SIG Sauer MPX series, with a suppressor.

Sig Sauer MCX

A Sig Sauer MPX series, with a suppressor. Such sound moderators under the Hearing Protection Act could be transferred just like regular rifles or shotguns rather than with a $200 tax stamp and lengthy wait times required under the NFA. (Photo: Chris Eger/Guns.com)

The Hearing Protection Act, to remove suppressors from the layers of regulation required by the National Firearms Act, was reintroduced to the Senate on Thursday.

Proposed by Idaho Republican U.S. Sen. Mike Crapo and 12 co-sponsors from a dozen red states, the bill is a repeat of one submitted to the last Congress that failed to gain traction despite GOP control of both chambers. The proposal would reclassify suppressors as firearms rather than NFA-regulate weapons, which would allow them to be transferred after a simple background check rather than current much more extensive process.

“It just makes sense to ease federal regulation of suppressors, which are already legal in most of states,” said U.S. Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith, R-Miss, one of the co-sponsors. “Some of the most liberal European nations require their use to reduce hearing-related injuries. This bill would make it easier to offer the same protection to law-abiding American sportsmen.”

Introduced this week as S. 817 the HPA would simply reclassify suppressors to regulate them like traditional firearms. It would not change any laws in states such as California and New York that already prevent suppressors, nor does it get rid of the requirement of a background check. There are currently more than 1.5 million suppressors in circulation nationwide.

The bill has the support of pro-hunting and gun rights groups such as the National Assembly of Sportsmen’s Caucus, Gun Owners of America, and the National Rifle Association as well as industry organizations like the American Suppressor Association and National Shooting Sports Foundation.

“This firearms safety legislation will enable gun owners to have better access to hearing protection accessories and improve safety for the shooting sports,” said Lawrence Keane, NSSF’s senior VP and general counsel. “These accessories have been unfortunately stigmatized and wrapped up by duplicitous background checks, extensive wait times and burdensome paperwork that doesn’t contribute to public safety.”

The measure will now go to the Senate Judiciary Committee for consideration. Meanwhile, a companion piece, U.S. Rep. Jeff Duncan’s H.R. 155 has 59 GOP co-sponsors in the Democrat-controlled House.

Duncan’s original Hearing Protection Act garnered 166 co-sponsors in the House last session and was rolled into a larger package of pro-hunting legislation, the SHARE Act, which was reported out of committee but never made it out of Congress.

Latest Reviews

  • Aguila 5mm Ammo Breathes New Life into Forgotten Plinkers (VIDEO)

    Thanks to Aguila and a revitalized interest in longer-range rimfire shooting, 40-year-old Remington 591 and 592 rifles are gaining popularity.

    Read Now
  • gun safe, safetech

    SnapSafe Treklite Serves Safe Gun Storage on the Go

    Billed as a means to easily carry a gun on the go, the SnapSafe TrekLite appears, on the surface, to...

    Read Now
  • dd5v1

    Gun Review: Daniel Defense DD5V1 rifle in .308 (VIDEO)

    Unlike Daniel Defense’s standard-fare – AR-15s chambered in 5.56 – the DD5V1 is an AR-10 chambered in .308. Guns.com checks...

    Read Now
  • Rex vs Canik

    Gun Review: Rex Zero 1 vs Canik TP9 Elite Combat (VIDEO)

    Two pistols that come with everything but the kitchen sink are FIME Group's Rex Zero 1 Tactical and Canik TP9...

    Read Now