Judge in Remington trigger lawsuit voices concerns over proposed settlement

U.S. District Judge Ortrie Smith this week raised questions with attorneys for Remington over the way the gun maker intends to correct alleged safety issues with its long-used Walker trigger.

According to reports from CNBC, Smith asked if company’s strategy to correct up to eight million firearms, most notably the Model 700 bolt-action rifle, included proposed buy-backs.

“If the guns are defective, why are they still out there?” Smith asked in court this week.

The rifles have been alleged to be defective due to a trigger design that allows a gun to fire unexpectedly.

Attorneys for the gun maker contended that, while “Remington is committed to this settlement,” denied that the guns were unsafe and many were likely too old at this point to be retrofitted. Gun owners whose rifles cannot be upgraded will receive vouchers for up to $12.50 in Remington-branded merchandise.

The original complaint, filed in January 2013, alleged Remington knowingly produced rifles with defective triggers before they hit the shelves in the late 1940s and continued to produce them over the years despite thousands of complaints and more than a hundred lawsuits.

The Walker trigger is exclusive to Remington bolt-action rifles, most notably the 700. According to court documents, the design utilizes an internal component known as a trigger “connector,” which in effect creates a unique design comprised of two distinctly different parts. The connector floats on top of the trigger rather than attached directly to it, and it is held in place by tension from a spring and the side plates.

Since the connector and trigger are not physically attached, they can separate to form a gap could where dust, debris, manufacturing burrs, lubrication, moisture, etc. could get trapped and throw off the alignment of other moving components.

The lawsuit, whose settlement had been postponed last year, alleged that under the right circumstances, the rifle — safety engaged or not — could fire a round without the trigger ever being pulled.

Smith is expected to release a preliminary opinion on the proposed settlement in coming weeks.

Latest Reviews

  • Four Years Later: IWI Tavor SAR Revisited

    Though IWI's X95, released in 2016, usurps the SAR, my Tavor SAR is still part of the family. For those just now coming across this model, how has it stood up over the years? Let's find out.

    Read More
  • Scope Review: Leupold VX-Freedom FireDot Twilight Hunter

    The budget-friendly line of American-made Leupold VX-Freedom riflescopes found a welcome audience last year, but 2020 sees even more interesting additions to the family, with our hands-down favorite being the illuminated-reticle FireDot line.

    Read More
  • Ruger AR-556: An Outstanding Gateway AR

    It should come as no surprise the Ruger name is synonymous with value, and its’ AR-556 looks to fit this mold as an entry-level AR-15 with a reasonable MSRP. So how does the no-frills Ruger AR-556 perform when put to the test? Read on to find out.

    Read More
  • A Look at the Sig P238, A Year Later

    The Sig Sauer P238 was the first .380 ACP BUG to grace my gun safe, a welcomed addition to the 9mm polymers, .38 SPL revolvers, and .45 ACP 1911s. After more than a year's worth of use, where do I stand on the P238? Let's find out.

    Read More

Loading