When I first got my hands on the Walther PD380 at SHOT Show in January, I thought it an interesting concept. The stylings of a PDP mixed with a lower-recoiling round in a hammer-fired package certainly had some appeal. Then I shot it. 

It had me smiling from ear to ear after a couple of magazines. My limited range time during Industry Day left me hungry for more, so I jumped at the chance to snag one for review (in OD Green, or ‘Military’ according to Walther). 

While my round count has been relatively low so far, the gun has given me a lot to like, and a few things I wish Walther would have done differently. 

 

Table of Contents

Initial Impressions
Learning Curve and Concerns
Comparisons
Specs
Range Time
Hiccups
Pros & Cons
Final Thoughts

Initial Impressions


Upon opening the box, my first thought was that it came with a very nice case, just like the PDP I own. It’s a welcome touch for those who want to store or carry their gun to the range this way. Picking it up, it seemed a bit bigger in my hands than I remembered at SHOT Show, but like most Walthers, it felt great. The finger grooves fit me well, and the texture was easy to grip. Walther once again nailed the ergonomics of this handgun. 
 

Like other Walthers I've had, this came with a nice carrying case. (Photo: Seth Rodgers/Guns.com)


It is essentially a retooled and redressed PK380 that borrows a lot of its design cues from the PDP lineup, which has been praised for its deep slide serrations and unique grip texture that seems to stick to the hand. I happen to love the “military green” color treatment that Walther sent as well. 

There are a couple of noticeable differences between this PD380 and my PDP. The first thing I found different on the PD380 was the paddle magazine release. I didn’t love this feature of the gun, especially after some range time, but more on that later. 
 

I love the grip texture on my PDP and was happy to see Walther transition that to other guns. Finger grooves are a deal breaker on some guns for me, but I found these to be comfortable and natural for my hands. (Photo: Seth Rodgers/Guns.com)


The next noticeable difference was the manual safety. Like other Walther, such as the PPK, the manual safety is the opposite of what I think of as natural. Instead of swiping down, like on a 1911, you swipe up to deactivate the safety. Again, it takes time to get used to. Finally, and maybe most noticeably in the end, there is no slide stop/release. It slims the pistol, especially when compared to the rather chunky slide release of the PDP. 
 

The slide serrations, just like the PDP, are deep and easy to manipulate. (Photo: Seth Rodgers/Guns.com)


I didn’t realize how much I use this feature until I spent a good bit of time with this gun on the range, but more on that in a minute. While it lacks a slide release, the slide is considerably easier to rack than other guns. With this feature, Walther aims to compete with guns like the M&P 380 EZ. Couple this with the deep slide serrations, and it’s no problem to slingshot the slide back into battery. 
 

Like most other Walthers I've ever handled, this gun had superb ergonomics and fit my average hands well. (Photo: Seth Rodgers/Guns.com)

 

Learning Curve and Concerns


When I first got the gun and took it out on the range, I thought it might have been broken because you can still pull the trigger with the safety on. I was very confused. After asking the guys at the shop counter and the guys at Walther, this is not totally uncommon. A handful of Walther designs employ this rotating safety style. More suspect, in my book, is that the trigger also acts as the decocker when in double action with the safety on.
 

I'm not a huge fan of the decock feature on this gun or the function of the safety. I would prefer, when a gun is on safe, that the trigger is dead and cannot be manipulated at all. (Photo: Seth Rodgers/Guns.com)

I think there are some safety concerns with training a shooter – especially a new shooter, which this gun seems to aim toward with the easy-racking slide – to decock the gun by pulling the trigger. You don’t have to let your imagination wander far to understand how this could go poorly, even for an experienced shooter, should they train to decock their gun in this manner. 

I would still advocate that you safely lower the hammer while depressing the trigger to decock this gun, even if the safety is on. But that’s just my two cents. With that rant over, let’s see how this gun stacks up to some other guns I have lying around. 
 

Comparisons


At its core, the PD380 is a single-stack .380 ACP pistol meant for concealed carry. We snagged a few similar guns from the Certified Used Collection for comparison. 

The most natural connection would be to compare it to the PK380, but we didn’t have any used at the time, so I moved on to the most famous Walther: the PPK, the Bond gun. It has become a concealed carry favorite due to its solid DA/SA trigger, dependability, and history. Comparing these two Walther, the PD380 comes in almost half an inch longer. Despite its lack of a slide stop, it’s nearly a quarter of an inch wider, too.

The all-important height factor goes to the PPK at just 3.8 inches versus the PD380’s 5.15 inches, but you’re getting three more rounds with the PD380. The PD380 also tips the scale a full 1.5 ounces heavier, coming in at 20.6 ounces. 
 

The new kid on the block compared to the old legend. (Photo: Seth Rodgers/Guns.com)
Compared to my first gun, one with a similar capacity in 9mm, the S&W M&P Shield 9. (Photo: Seth Rodgers/Guns.com)
Compared to the current EDC, the P365X with Gideon Optics MRD. (Photo: Seth Rodgers/Guns.com)
Compared to a more full-sized gun, the BRG9, a Turkish XDM clone. (Photo: Seth Rodgers/Guns.com)

 

Specs

  • Caliber: .380 ACP
  • Capacity: 9+1
  • Overall length: 6.48 inches
  • Barrel length: 3.7 inches
  • Width: 1.24 inches
  • Height: 5.15 inches
  • Weight (empty): 20.6 ounces
     

Range Time
 

The PD380 was both light recoiling and easy to handle on the range. (Photo: Paul Peterson/Guns.com)


When I got this gun on the range, a few things became immediately apparent. The first was that the gun was incredibly light recoiling, which shouldn’t be that big of a surprise given its weight and length when paired with the round. It shot well on the range, and of the .380s I rounded up to compare it to, it was probably the most accurate and consistent. The magazine release took some time for me to get used to. 

Now, I have spent minimal time training with this style of mag release, but I struggled with it. I know all the VP9 fans out there will claim the paddle release is a superior mag release style, but the HK version seems more intuitive than the PD380, maybe because the VP9 is a larger platform. On the Walther, I ended up using my middle finger because it was a far reach for the thumb and required an awkward movement to actuate it with the pointer finger. 
 

Among some of the ammo that was tested with the PD380, we experienced some malfunctions throughout the lineup. (Photo: Seth Rodgers/Guns.com)



Related: Home of the PDP and PPK – Factory Tour of Walther's German Plant


Either way, it is an ambidextrous option, so there are many ways to skin the cat on the mag release strategy. I know with time and training it could become a more natural process, but I question how long it would personally take me to master. I hope Walther will make a version with an American-style mag release in the future.

It has good capacity for a .380 and was by far the most controllable of the .380s I had on hand for testing in terms of recoil and follow-up shots. I did consistently find myself trying to hit the slide release, which is more of a training scar I should work through rather than a knock on the gun. Because of this scar, though, I typically prefer a slide release on my carry gun. 
 



Perhaps I’m spoiled by my PDP, which has a phenomenal trigger, or the PPQ, which I’ve also shot a bunch and has an equally great, if not better, trigger. With those high standards in mind, I thought I would love this trigger. I’m sad to say I just don’t. The double action is heavy and long, which isn’t necessarily a terrible thing, but it also has a sponginess and doesn’t have a very defined wall. In single action, there is still a bit of the same problem, but it’s a shorter pull so it’s more forgiving. 

Walther advertises the single-action pull at 5.6 pounds, with double action at 10 pounds. 
 

There are certainly guns I shoot much better than this one, and there are shooters who can do much better than this. But this was pretty much par for the course for me. Shot at 25 feet with the Federal ammo see in the photo. (Photo: Seth Rodgers/Guns.com)

 

Hiccups


I put around 400 rounds through this gun of various ammunition including Federal Hydra-Shok, Federal American Eagle Lead Free, Double Tap JHP, and Winchester white box. I experienced a handful of malfunctions including failure to eject and failure to feed across all ammunition types.

I sent the gun back to Walther with some of these reports, and they communicated that they couldn’t replicate the issues. 
 

These malfunctions weren't totally uncommon on our test gun. (Photo: Seth Rodgers/Guns.com)


Unfortunately, upon getting the gun back, I still had some of the same issues. The silver lining, of course, is that Walther has some incredible customer service and a great warranty program, so if you have to send the gun back for work, it’s covered.  
 

Pros and Cons

The PD380 presents a nice option for those who prefer the .380 ACP cartridge. It’s got a large capacity for a single stack and its larger frame leads to a more controllable gun when compared to the pocket pistols I had. However, there are still some things I wish Walther had done differently, at least for me to consider it as my next EDC.
 

Pros:

  • Large capacity, single stack chambered in .380 ACP
  • Great ergonomics, feels great in the hand
  • Very controllable
  • Easy follow up shots
  • Easy to rack for easy manipulation
  • Great color
  • Very affordable

Cons:

  • Not a fan of paddle magazine release
  • Hate the trigger safety/decocker feature
  • Wish there was a slide release
  • Forced to eject the mag on an empty magazine to release the slide
  • Trigger was just ok compared to other Walther guns I’ve shot


Final Thoughts


Overall, what I thought was love at first sight back in January turned into a quick summer fling. There are some features to like about this gun, but for me there were too many turn offs to make it my next carry gun. However, if you’re someone who likes the .380 ACP caliber, and is need of that easier to use operation, then maybe the PD380 is the gun for you. It’s always worth testing out to find out for yourself. 

Read More On:
revolver barrel loading graphic

Loading