New York’s Bid to Derail Supreme Court Gun Case Rebuffed

04/30/19 8:00 AM | by

Springfield 1911 pistol on display table

Springfield 1911 stainless on table

New York officials tried to get the U.S. Supreme Court to hold off on looking at one of the city’s gun control laws. The Court said no this week. (Photo: Chris Eger/Guns.com)

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday turned away an effort by New York officials to hold off on a challenge to the City’s restrictive gun laws. New York had asked the nation’s high court to delay the case brought by three local gun owners who argue the City’s “premises permit” scheme — which drastically restricts the ability to leave one’s premises with a firearm — is unconstitutional.

While the law was previously upheld by lower and appellate courts, the Supreme Court agreed in January to hear a further challenge to the City’s restriction — the first such move by the court on a major gun case since 2010. This triggered a response by City officials to try to short circuit the case while local lawmakers evaluated changes to their gun control statute, arguing that the subject was moot.

On Monday, the Justices denied City’s motion, setting the stage for the case to continue. The gun owners who first took the City to court six years ago are backed in their effort by the National Rifle Association and their state affiliate. Attorneys for the plaintiffs argued New York could have changed their law at any time in the past half-decade and only chose to do so this month in order to avoid defending the statute in Washington– which could lead to a win for gun rights with nationwide reverberations.

“The City of New York clearly knows that its current restrictions on the carrying and transportation of lawfully owned firearms are unconstitutional and will fail under any standard of constitutional review, as the NRA has been saying for years,” said Chris Cox, head of the group’s lobbying arm.

New York’s effort was not the first time a city with strict local gun control laws sought to quickly change them when facing a potential precedent-setting loss in a high court. In 2017, the District of Columbia decided not to push its luck and declined to send a case overturning the city’s strict “may-issue” policy for issuing concealed carry permits to the Supreme Court, moving instead to amend their law.

Latest Reviews

  • 5.11 Tactical

    5.11 Tactical Brings Comfort to Range Day with Raven Range Tight

    The Raven Range Tights bust into a budding leggings movement; but how do these leggings measure up on the range...

    Read Now
  • Model 301

    Finding Romance in a Single Shot .410 and Heavyweight TSS (VIDEO)

    One of Savage's most sought-after items is also one of the smallest and cheapest in its lineup, the Stevens-by-Savage Model...

    Read Now
  • Gear Review: Walker's Razor XV Mutes Gunfire, Protects Small Talk

    Today electronic ear pro technology is small enough to fit in just a few square inches of space and Walker’s...

    Read Now
  • Glock generations

    Glock Gen 3, 4, or 5: What Generation is Right for Me? (VIDEO)

    I snagged three generations of Glock 19 pistols from the Guns.com warehouse – the Gen 3, Gen 4 and Gen...

    Read Now