We all win with American-made lever guns. While Smith & Wesson holds all the attention with its new lever actions, Henry quietly continues cranking out its gems. The two companies’ most comparable models are the Henry Big Boy All-Weather and the S&W Model 1854.
The two rifles are surprisingly similar, but a handful of little-noticed differences may sway buyers one way or the other. Here’s what you should know.
The numbers on these two rifles are quite similar. Smith & Wesson’s standard 1854 uses a 19.25-inch round barrel that is threaded and with an included thread cover in place. Henry’s All Weather Big Boy, by contrast, uses a 20-incher and is only threaded on a few variants.
Henry's Big Boy All-Weather in .357 Magnum compares nicely with Smith & Wesson's synthetic-stocked Model 1854. (All photos: Kristin Alberts/Guns.com)
Where the S&W wears a large loop, Henry’s All Weather stays standard on the Big Boy lineup. Both ship in a branded cardboard box with little fanfare other than Henry’s slip-on receiver cover.
S&W went big on the loop for the 1854, while the Henry model keeps the standard size lever.
As Smith & Wesson’s lever is new to the market this year, it’s not quite fair to compare the list of model variants and chamberings with Henry’s extensive catalog. But things are progressing quickly at S&W, with first only .44 Magnum, then a .45 Colt addition.
Henry’s All Weathers are marked as being made in Rice Lake, Wisconsin, while our S&W 1854 is stamped Springfield, Mass. It’s always a pleasure to see any firearms, and especially levers, built in the USA. Henry’s customer care is hard to beat in the industry, with a lifetime warranty – period. Meanwhile, Smith & Wesson offers a limited warranty to the original owner of the firearm, with fine print available on the website.
Specs
Furniture & Finish
For close comparison’s sake, we’re pitting Henry’s All-Weather Big Boy against S&W’s standard model 1854. This S&W comes dressed in black polymer stocks with textured grip panels. Three M-LOK slots at the forend allow shooters to mount accessories, while sling mounting points are found at the forend cap and buttstock. The stainless frame and barrel wear a matte silver finish. Ghost ring sights and a Picatinny rail add to the tactical appeal.
The Henry (top) wears dark-stained hardwood furniture, while the 1854 uses black polymer.
Henry’s All-Weather achieves the blacked-out furniture look with a dark-stained hardwood against what the company calls an “industrial hard chrome satin” finish on the receiver and hard chrome-plated steel barrel. Swivel studs come factory installed. Overall, the Henry presents a more traditional aesthetic.
Both rifles include a rubber butt pad.
Both rifles are complete with a solid black rubber recoil pad, though neither has much recoil to negate. Hardwood feels more solid than synthetic to yours truly, but again, the choice defers to personal taste. S&W leans toward tactical appeal with the 1854, while the X-Models fill that niche for Henry.
Safety
The argument for and against a manual safety on lever actions rages on, and these two guns will satisfy both camps. Henry remains true to their more purist form, forgoing an unsightly push button for a transfer bar mechanism.
Smith & Wesson opted for a push-button safety, while Henry sticks with using the transfer bar only.
Not surprisingly, given the key locks on S&W’s wheel guns, the 1854 opts for a manual cross-bolt safety located at the rear of the receiver. This comes down to personal preference, but for those of us accustomed to classic levers without the cross-bolt, it takes some familiarizing.
Loading & Capacity
Both the S&W and Henry can be loaded via the receiver’s side gate, though the Henry can also be loaded via its expected tubular magazine port. S&W misses the boat here. While the 1854 does feature a removable mag tube, which is exceptionally handy for quick and safe unloading, their single piece tube does not allow for charging.
The Henry (at top) can be loaded via the side loading gate or its tubular magazine port, but the Smith & Wesson doesn't allow loading on the tubular magazine.
To be fair, Henry only recently added the side gate, so earlier models will not show that useful feature. Henry advertises 10 rounds for their .44 Magnum All-Weather, while S&W advertises nine, with a slightly shorter tube length.
Optical Setup
Whether you fall into the purist camp of iron sights alone or the “scope it” category, today’s lever guns do a quality job of covering both bases. Smith’s 1854 wears a gold beaded tall front sight with an XS ghost ring rear that is part of the included Picatinny rail. The receiver is drilled and tapped to be compatible with standard Marlin 1894 mounts, too. Well played, S&W.
The Henry at left compared to the 1854 at right. Both rifles wear a brass bead front sight.
The 1854 sports a top Pic rail and is drilled and tapped for Marlin 1894 mounts, while the Henry below features a fully adjustable semi-buckhorn and diamond-insert rear sight.
Henry uses its expected brass bead front paired with the fully adjustable semi-buckhorn and diamond insert rear. Except for the All-Weather Picatinny Rail Side Gate model with its named optics mount, the Big Boy All-Weather does not include a rail, but rather, is drilled and tapped.
Henry offers the All-Weather Picatinny Rail Side Gate model for those looking to pair their lever gun with an optic.
Trigger
Two things are generally true here: a clean and crisp trigger pull aids in accuracy, and lever actions are not known for exceptional target triggers. Yet both manufacturers make moves in the right direction. Our test model Big Boy All-Weather breaks at a pleasant, crisp 4.5 pounds on a Lyman Digital Pull Gauge.
Note the flat-faced trigger on the Model 1854 at top.
S&W takes an interesting approach to the 1854 trigger, using a flat blade more reminiscent of competition triggers, though they use a Marlin-related design that lets the trigger “flop” freely without spring tension. That aside, our 1854 test gun’s trigger pull was better than average, breaking repeatedly around the 5-pound mark with a little take-up and creep.
Both rifles are plenty accurate at the 50 and 100-yard ranges where one would reasonably hunt and shoot with the handgun chamberings. Not surprisingly, both makers’ levers ran with 100-percent reliability with every type of ammunition tested.
Price
As closely as we can compare apples to apples (the S&W 1854 Standard model against the handgun-chambered Henry Big Boy All-Weather), on-paper costs are eerily similar: $1,283 for the Henry and $1,279 for the S&W. Real-world prices vary widely (and are often less on Guns.com!), so take that into consideration. You’re certainly far more likely to find a used Henry given its longevity, with the new 1854s in shorter supply and higher demand.
Shooters moving into other model variants along the same line will find a S&W 1854 Limited Edition of only 1,854 units with high-grade walnut, along with a significantly increased retail cost of $3,849. Likewise, the latest Traditional Walnut rifles see a slight uptick in cost over the Standard.
Meanwhile, big game hunters will appreciate Henry’s All-Weather bigger chamberings in .30-30 Win and .45-70 Gov’t, surprisingly priced the same as their Big Boy kin. Of course, Henry offers dozens of other variants, from blued steel to brass and case color, engraved special editions, and many more, all with varying price points.
Final Thoughts
We’ve seldom written any “versus” piece where there’s a clear-cut winner. The correct choice for each individual depends on their aesthetic taste, desired use, and budget.
For years, I’ve hunted everything from squirrelsto Cape buffalo with Henrys, so unseating that loyalty is a tough push, while the S&W will win over buyers long loyal to that brand. No matter the selection, it’s heartwarming to see more companies entering the joyous world of lever actions.